fbpx
Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Lake CX332 vs Shimano RP9 Review

 

I have been cycling for the past 20 years of my life. I have tried many pairs of cycling shoes. Currently, I have two pairs of cycling shoes in my home: Lake CX332 and Shimano RP9. For each pair of shoes, I have worn it for 15,000 km in mileage, used in my trainings and races. I will be doing a comparison of them. At the end of this blog, you will find out which is the winner of the two pairs. The product review is unbiased and I do not receive any commission from the bicycle shop. 

The first shoe is Lake CX332 while the second shoe is Shimano RP9. Both are the high end models in their respective brand of shoe line up.

BrandLake CX332Shimano RP9
Outer SoleCarbon Fibre
A picture containing indoor, sitting, table, different
Description automatically generated

The carbon fibre sole in CX332 is thicker than RP9. This means more power transfer on downward pedalling from your leg to the wheels.
Carbon Fibre
A group of shoes on a wooden surface
Description automatically generated



Lacing MethodBOA
A close up of some shoes
Description automatically generated

The lacing system comprises of two BOA’s located at the side of the shoe. Throughout the ride, my feet are snugly fitted in the CX332. Minimal adjustments are needed even when I am riding in wet weather condition.
To lace up, push the boa inwards and turn it downwards till your foot is snug fit.To loosen slightly, turn it upwards to release little tension till your foot is snug fit.To unlace, pull the boa outwards and the lace will be fully loosen for removal of foot.
Velcro and Buckle
A group of shoes on top of a hard wood floor
Description automatically generated

The lacing system comprises of two Velcro and a Buckle located at the side of the shoe. My feet are not as snug feeling compared to CX332. This is because the Velcro tend to be looser when you have force pulling and pushing the pedal during motion of pedaling. I had to re-velcro the shoes whenever I want to get a snug feel. When riding in wet weather, I am unable to get the snug feel compared to CX332. I had a few crashes when I was using the Shimano R315 (a model earlier that RP9) which also uses the same Velcro and Buckle lacing system. The buckle cracks upon impact to the ground and the shoe cannot be used anymore.
MaterialKangaroo Leather
Shoes on a wooden floor
Description automatically generated

When I first wore the CX332, my feet hurts as the leather is stiff. After 10 rides with Lake CX332, the shoe started to break in and felt very comfortable. Its leather is thicker than the other brands which I have used previously. This means that when you unintentionally fall, the friction between the road surface and the shoe will have lesser chance of bruising it. I like the feel of my foot enclosed in the CX332 because of the kangaroo leather. It is very soft and comfortable to wear it, especially when my ride distance exceeds 100km. I have used cycling shoes from many brands and somehow did not get this type of feeling.
PVC Leather
Shoes on a wooden floor
Description automatically generated

When I first wore the RP9, my feet hurts a little compared to the CX332 because the shoe is generally spacious. After 5 rides, the shoe started to break in and felt comfortable. The toe box of RP9 is wider than CX332. If you have a very wide feet, RP9 is the shoe to go for. The shoe has a plastic odour after usage due to its PVC leather. 


Toe ShieldNo
There is no Toe Shield present in CX332. Hence, the leather at the toe area gets scuffed by the tires in certain occasions. 
Yes
I like the toe shield that is present in the RP9. It prevents the scuffing of the tires and the shoe during pedaling in certain occasions, which protects the leather from damaging.
Heel CupsMouldable
A picture containing indoor, table, sitting, wooden
Description automatically generated

Although it is mouldable, I strongly discourage you to heat and mold the heel cup as the shape of the shoe may change depending on how much you heat you used to alter its shape. This is from my past experiences.
Not Mouldable
A silver shoes on a wooden floor
Description automatically generated

Heel Cup in RP9 is not mouldable. 
Heel PadsReplaceable
Even after 15000 km of riding, the heel pad is not worn off.
Not Replaceable
After 15000 km of riding, the heel pad is worn off.
ColoursBlack, White, Chameleon BlueBlack, White
Inner SoleSingle Piece
A picture containing wooden, sitting, table, indoor
Description automatically generated

The inner sole comes in one piece. It does not have the flexibility to adjust the arch support to suit all cyclists.
Adjustable Arch Support with Mid and High Pads provided
A pair of shoes
Description automatically generated

The inner sole comes together with two arch support pads to suit riders with low, mid or high arch. 
Euro Size43 Extra Wide
A group of shoes on a wooden table
Description automatically generated
43 Wide
A picture containing indoor, table, sitting, wooden
Description automatically generated
Weight235 gram230 gram
Mileage15000 km15000 km
Duration to break in10 rides5 rides
Comfort Level Toe BoxSnug
Spacious 
Wider than CX332
Comfort Level Heel BoxSnugSnug 
Dry Weather RidingSnug (Video, Dry)
Comfort level in both dry and wet conditions remains equal.In dry weather, the breathability of the kangaroo leather doesn’t make my feet sweat a lot compared to shoes made from PVC leather. 
Snug
Comfort level in both dry and wet conditions varies. In dry weather, the PVC leather tends to make my feet sweat a lot more compared to CX332.
Wet Weather RidingSnug (Video, Wet)
In wet weather, the raindrops tend to repel away from the leather.
Loose
In wet weather, my feet lost its snug feel and I had to retighten the Velcro and Buckle to retain its snug feel.
Issues facedOnly scuff marks at the toe section. The leather is intact to the carbon sole.
A close up of a hard wood floor
Description automatically generated
Toe Shield and the leather gave way after 15,000km. Parts of the carbon sole came off and I had to use shoe goo to temporary stick it back.
A group of shoes on a wooden floor
Description automatically generated
Price$465$299
Level of cyclingAdvancedIntermediate, Advanced

Many cyclists are curious to put on their new gears immediately after purchasing it. One must note that any shoes in the market has to be seasoned in order to feel comfortable when wearing it. “Good things must wait.”

Bike Guru’s Pick

In conclusion, I prefer Lake CX332 over Shimano RP9 in terms of its comfort, design and performance. Lake CX332 is priced at $465 while Shimano RP9 is priced at $299. I strongly recommend Lake CX332 for advanced cyclist due to its construction and durability.

Also Great

If you want to have a shoe for performance and don’t wish to spend a lot, Shimano RP9 will be second in the line up to consider. It is catered for cyclist between intermediate and advanced level.

Budget Picks

If you are beginner cyclist and on super budget conscious, I will recommend you several models to buy and start with. Lake CX176, Shimano RP1, Specialized Torch 1.0.

For Narrow Feet

If you have narrow foot, you can consider cycling shoes from brands such as Sidi, DMT, Gaerne.

For Wide Feet

If you have wide foot, you can consider Lake CX237 which offers a wider toe box compared to Lake CX332. Visit The Bike Settlement as they are distributor for Lake Cycling Shoes in Singapore. 

List of cycling shoes worn & tested by Bike Guru

2019Lake CX332$465Dual BOA
2017 Shiman RP9$299Velcro and Buckle
2015Sidi Genius 5$250Velcro and Buckle
2014Shimano R315#350Velcro and Buckle
2013Bont Vaypor$400Dual BOA
2012Specialized Sworks$399Dual BOA
2010Shimano RD86$100Velcro
2005DMT Ultimax$300Velcro and Buckle

This post is not sponsored by any of the brands or shops mentioned. Bike Guru does not receive any commissions or benefits from the sale of the products reviewed in this post. The product recommendations are based on Bike Guru’s personal opinions.

Copyright © Bike Guru™, Terence Lee Meng Kai 2022. All Rights Reserved.
Bike Guru, the Bike Guru logo, the ‘Expert tips & advice for cyclists” tagline, and the “g” monogram are registered trademarks of Terence Lee Meng Kai.
Other product names, logos and company names used in this website are trademarked and copyrighted properties of their respective owners or licensors.